Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the planto domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/alliedrenew/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131
Materials Comparison – AlliedRenew

Materials Comparison

Materials Comparison

Rotisserie Chicken in Flexible Packaging vs. Traditional Packaging

Ready-to-eat rotisserie chickens have traditionally been packaged in rigid dome containers.  Innovative technology now allows a flexible package to perform in a deli hot case for freshly prepared foods while reducing environmental impacts.

Rigid Dome Container (Tray & Lid)

Product Weight              40 ounces
Packaging Weight         64 g
Energy Consumption    5.49
Emissions                       0.20

Flexible Pouch

Product Weight               40 ounces
Packaging Weight          15 g
Energy Consumption     1.35              
Emissions                        0.03

Examples of packaging needed to package 60 pounds of beverage.

Glass = 50 pounds
Rigid PET = 6 pounds
Aluminum = 3 pounds
Flexible plastic = 1.5 pounds

Why the Flexible Pouch?
  • Eighty-eight percent less fossil fuel is used, and 85% fewer CO2 emissions are generated during the manufacturing of flexible pouches.1
  • The fossil fuel equivalent of changing a year’s worth of rigid dome rotisserie chicken packaging to flexible pouches would save enough gas to drive around the world 1,475 times. 2
  • The flexible pouch uses 91% less space by case in shipping.  More than 12 truckloads of rigid containers are needed to ship the same amount of Hot N Handy (trademark) pouches contained in one 53′-long truckload.3
  • The flexible pouch offers a 2/3 reduction of solid waste by weight introduced in landfills versus rigid dome packaging.1
  • The flexible pouch offers value-added features such as built-in handle, a resealable zipper, and being microwaveable and hot case ready.

Sources:
2013 Flexible Packaging Association
1  Data based on 2007 Life Cycle Analysis testing by Robbie Manufacturing, Inc., conducted using SimaPro 7.1 LCA Software
2  Compared to rigid packaging based on annual rotisserie sales of 550 M units.  Fuel estimate:  1,809,623 gallons; total miles:  36,729,786.25 @ 20.3 MPG.  Calculations generated using U.S. Energy Information Administration and U.S. EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator.
3  Based on industry average packaging/shipping dimensions of rigid packaged rotisserie chicken.